Anarchy as in "self managed libertarian society" or as in the common, media fed view that anarchy is somehow evil and chaotic?
Whatever. It is still a nonsense to suggest that ISP-level content filtering is an attack on democracy when it is actually merely an attempt to bring things into line in relation to illegal material (etc) as with the offline world ... or are the folk wailing the most and loudest about all of this also of the view that it is an attack on democracy to control illegal material (etc) where ever it may be ?
In which case, not only are they arguing hysterical nonsense, but also demonstrating hypocrisy by trying to promote/continue with anarchy over democracy whilst also claiming a (false) attack on a democracy they appear to neither want nor realistically support in terms of its effective and natural/standard function.
regarDS